Would someone please explain this to me?

I’ve previously mentioned Jonathan Neville’s odd sense of humor. (Honestly, I don’t think he understands what a meme is and is not.)

But while funny and unfunny are subjective, attempts at humor should at least be intelligible.

Can someone please explain this to me?

That’s not just unfunny; it doesn’t even make sense. Since the “M2C”* conspiracy is very real (at least in Neville’s own mind), is the meme claiming that I also exist? (Because, obviously I do.) Or is it claiming that the fictional character of Peter Pan exists? (If so, I worry about Neville’s sanity.)

Maybe what he means by it is “the Mesoamerican setting for the Book of Mormon isn’t real and neither is the fictional character of Peter Pan.” This might explain the meme, but I still question if it’s funny or even clever.

Neville calls that meme “a popular favorite.” By what measure does he deem it so? Did he take a poll of his readers? It’s brand new, so he can’t be going off of page views. This is all simply bizarre.

In the same blog post, Neville uploaded this image:

His Venn diagram drawing is a non sequitur. The Neville-Neville Land blog quotes him and links to his own writings. My readers can evaluate for themselves if I’ve misrepresented him, but in two-and-a-half years, no one—not even Neville himself—has even attempted to demonstrate if or how I’ve done so.

—Peter Pan
 
* “M2C” is Jonathan Neville’s acronym for the theory that the Book of Mormon took place in Mesoamerica and that the hill Cumorah in the Book of Mormon is not the same hill in New York where Joseph Smith received the plates of Mormon.